Condolences

I want to extend my deepest sympathies to the people of London and all of England. We have yet another example of the savagary of Al Queda and groups like it. Our hearts, our thoughts, and ou prayers are with you this day.

There have been reports that Italy and even Denmark are possible targets for the near future. It is time to realize that these terrorists wish to disrupt and remove the Western world. The United States, Russia, Spain, and now England have all been victims of this heinous crimes against humanity. This is a disease now affecting every county in the world, and it must be eliminated! Forget global warming, limit talks on African Aid, the number one issue fo the world is still Terrorism. And I hope that our leaders can finally agree that now is the time to act.

Update: Click Read More


My good freind over at Politcal Notio posted a view of the London terrorist attack. Here is my response and an example of why Republicans and Democrats can't agree on how to handle terrorism; Democrats see terrorist acts as criminal activies and Republicans see them as acts of war. That is the root of all the discussion.

"I ask you, is this a criminal act or a act of war? Because the answer to that question is at the heart of the policy that the world must take. If anyone had a narrow scope that no attacks would take elsewhere other than Iraq, then they are only fooling themselves.

Bush has said repeatedly that yes, this war if fought on foreign soil so that we need not fight it here, but that we are still under the warning of future attacks, why else for the color warning system.

The truth is this, and I am sorry you don't see it, you can't sit at a table with terrorists and negotiate peace, that is not what they want. They look for one thing, the total and complete destruction of the Western world, all of it and it's influence.

I see only two avenues in which to take, and perhaps that is because my scope is too narrow, but I see it like this; we either assimilate into Muslims, which even in itself does not guarantee peace, or eliminate those who wish us harm.

The prior does not seem likely, and the latter is not easy. So where does that leave us? When that question is answered completely and coherently, then the debate of changing policies becomes viable."