Posted By MJ
The Terry Schiavo matter is a disappointing display of governmental control. The entire subject is of such a personal nature involving a grieving family that I almost feel judgmental writing about it. Of course, as we are reminded seemingly by the hour, this debate, this silly overblown debate, is about life, death and choices.
Pro-life, Pro-choice, whatever you call yourself it’s all so old. The labels themselves are as inaccurate as those who claim to abide by them. Once again, however, the nation gapes at Florida with political eyes to see how the first campaign issue since the November presidential election will unfold. Yes, that’s right, life and death was a campaign issue- largely a Neocon debate engulfed by Democrats. You see, just because the campaigns end, the issues don’t. When candidates depend on such private matters as abortion and gay marriage to dominate the political scene, and when they enlarge the debate to a national crisis stage like Bush did in 2004, these issues just don’t go away as easily as many think. These are the very issues Bush campaigned on, this is the state of the union, and the monster that has been created and it will get worse.
Is Schiavo really about a choice? Is this matter really about life and death? Yes, it is about choice, but not the public’s choice. And it’s certainly not about the public’s death. I don’t know how much more private a matter such as this could be. Why won’t people just leave it at that?
Protestors, or supporters, I’m really not sure how to refer to either side, pray for the life of Schiavo and demand for the repentance of those who either refuse to pick a side or those who don’t believe the same as they do. Why are people so worried about everyone else’s sin?
I had a Republican friend tell me that this debate is really about abortion and Roe v. Wade and everything to do with life and death decisions. From a distance, the debate appears that way, but the Schiavo case is much deeper. There is no doubt, however, that the issue eventually boils down to abortion rights. And since the Neocons have made abortion such a crisis and of such religious importance, and because I don’t want to talk about Schiavo, I think we all must stop and ask: What sort of choice are we talking about? And since this debate will not go away, I think it’s time Democrats reconsider the abortion issue and for Republicans to stop trying to be so righteous.
Abortion is not a joyful choice. I don’t even think abortion is a woman’s issue nor do I believe that abortion is merely only a woman’s choice. The overall result of abortion is the ceasing of human life. I do not know of any woman who would joyfully make that decision and then brag about her right to do so. Women do not leave abortion clinics celebrating their right to abortion like they left the voting booth in 1920 when voting for the first time.
There must be an understanding that abortion is not a Liberal issue involving women being treated equally. It’s about tough personal decisions brought about by many different circumstances, all of which are about life.
Yet, life does not stop at birth. So the Pro-life people are just as clouded in their thinking as the people they detest.
Amazingly, people who declare that being Pro-life is about saving lives are eerily the same ones who want welfare dismantled, who want Social Security phased-out, who call any and all social programs communism, who hate taxes and demand that they should not be responsible for hand-me-downs to people that they think choose to be poor. If this debate is about life then shouldn’t we really talk about life, including birth and upbringing? How can people claim that babies should be born no matter the circumstance, counting babies being born into poverty, drug addiction and a vicious cycle, be so against the social aspects of life after that baby is born?
I don’t think I’ll ever understand either side.
This debate is not about life and death. It’s about labels, and labels are a very lazy way to do politics. Because of our laziness, we have created a nation of hysteria. Not to mention of hypocrites as well.
March 22, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
George Carlin's take on "pro-life" concerns: "Pre-born, you're fine! Pre-school, you're f**ked!"
ReplyDeleteThanks Mike, that's funny stuff.
ReplyDeleteI suppose I just get tired of debates that don't focus on the issue at hand, and instead focus on labels, religion and very personal decisions, which are no one elses business- especially that of the president or governor or any other Neocon.
I don't think making the decision to have an abortion would be an easy one. And I certainly don't know of anyone that celebrates after having an abortion.
At the same time, Democrats or Pro-choice people (cause not all Democrats are Pro-choice and vice versa for Republicans), aren't entirely right either. I think the argument that abortion is about treating women as equals is lousy and totally unfounded.
Back to Schiavo....it's really none of the governments business. Bush overstepped his bounds, and of course, no one seems to care one bit. The man gets away with everything. I just wish for once he would sit down and be made to answer for some of his decisions.
Thanks again.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI did some research today about the Schiavo case, and I found a interesting article on The Drudge Report. In it, it stated that Terri is not on life support, as many including myself, believed. She is breathing on her own, and all her organs are working within normal parameters. The only thing not working properly is her brain, and the feeding tube is what actually keeps her alive.
ReplyDeleteThis makes this matter exist more in the gray area for me. Had she been on life support, to me it would be a no brainer, turn it off. But, except for her brain inability, she is alive. Would you let an autism person die? Their brain doesn't work properly. Ok, maybe a stretch.
As a conservative, I don't like when government gets in the middle of personal affairs, as long as no one outside of the individual committing questionable behavior gets hurt. Abortion, to me fits that category as the unborn child, through no fault of it's own, is harmed by the actions of another. In a perfect world, this is what would happen: Mr. Schiavo would relinquish any and all rights to Terri. She would fall under the watch and care of her parents, and they would be responsible for her life, or the lack thereof.
The issues of the heart are truly the toughest ones to take a side with. They are the quickest divide among all you have differing thoughts. But it is in these decisions that we really find out who we are.
No I wouldn't want someone with autism to be put to death. And I never said that Schiavo should die either. All I said was that it's none of our business, especially the president's.
ReplyDeleteSince it doesn't concern me, I don't have an opinion on it. But since the president and other Neocons think it's their business and have made it so public, I think it's fair for anyone to weigh-in, even though I don't think they should.
Also, I don't think reading the Drudge Report would qualify as research :) Now reading some medical journals yes, but not Drudge.
Your blog is certainly an entertaining read! I'll most certainly be adding a link to it on my page.
ReplyDeleteKeep it up!
Eddie